An overview of the Janus case from the NYTimes

Adam Liptak of the New York Times writes:

"Mr. Janus’s lawyers said the case is about freedom of speech and association. The activities of public unions are akin to lobbying, they said, and so are by their nature political. Forcing unwilling workers to pay for such activities violates the First Amendment, they added, by compelling them to support messages with which they disagree."

To read the full article, click here. (Subscription may be required)